ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de
Betreff: Ag-meinungsfindungstool mailing list
Listenarchiv
- From: "marc" <marc AT merkstduwas.de>
- To: "Start/Metagov" <start AT metagovernment.org>, "AG Meinungsfindungstool" <ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de>
- Subject: Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Common business entity model
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:59:14 +0200
- Importance: Normal
- List-archive: <https://service.piratenpartei.de/pipermail/ag-meinungsfindungstool>
- List-id: <ag-meinungsfindungstool.lists.piratenpartei.de>
- Organization: merkst Du was?
Michael Allan schrieb
I think it's possible to go very far indeed. But I wonder if there's
a place in it for the particular kind of technology I work on, and the
personal concerns that I have?
What make you think that this might not be the case?
As far as I know your concerns are tightly coupled to Votorola, aren't they?
Those are the questions I ask in the
other thread. Because if there *is* a place, then I would definitely
be willing to shoulder my share of the workload. :-)
And as far as I understand in our discussion on the 'opinion formation' thread we are very close to eachother, aren't we?
But I definitely want to learn more about your concerns and how you think they can match with the ones of our working group and even all other projects around...
Cheers
Marc
- [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, Michael Allan, 20.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, marc, 20.10.2012
- [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Common business entity model, Michael Allan, 21.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] Common business entity model, marc, 21.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Common business entity model, Michael Allan, 22.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Common business entity model, marc, 22.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Common business entity model, Michael Allan, 23.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Common business entity model, marc, 23.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Common business entity model, Michael Allan, 23.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Common business entity model, marc, 22.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Common business entity model, Michael Allan, 22.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] Common business entity model, marc, 21.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, Michael Allan, 21.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, marc, 21.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, Michael Allan, 22.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, Slash, 22.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, marc, 23.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, Schallehn AT t-online.de, 23.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, marc, 23.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, Dinu Gherman, 25.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, Schallehn AT t-online.de, 25.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, Dinu Gherman, 25.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, Schallehn AT t-online.de, 23.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, Michael Allan, 22.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, marc, 21.10.2012
- [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Common business entity model, Michael Allan, 21.10.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation, marc, 20.10.2012
Archiv bereitgestellt durch MHonArc 2.6.19.