Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] The way forward according to technicians (Marc of Meinungsfindungstool)

[max stalnaker <max.stalnaker AT gmail.com>]

Mike

i have been unhappy with the little short mnemonics but looking at the link and then going to the mnemonic link left me happy unexpectedly.

Now for you in particular your mnemonic does not quite link to an explanation of the mneumonic.  It is that trailing vowel.  Maybe you can help me there.

For me one of my difficulties is that I am not inclined to say what *we* should do.  I might be happy if *I* were to do something.

I am not sure that I should try to address that in this forum.  But suppose I had an mnemonic from you for that.  What would that be?

And suppose I did do something in the past and that informs my present and future plans, do you really care? 

Max

On Jul 8, 2014 3:51 PM, "Michael Allan" <mike AT zelea.com> wrote:

Thanks Marc, I corrected it for you:
http://metagovernment.org/wiki/Overplan/c/WtG?oldid=4230

For the first time, we start to see what people are actually trying to
do in the way of practical steps forward:
http://metagovernment.org/wiki/Overplan/soc/person-22

Mike


marc said:
> Mike said:
> > So your attempt to compare two different ways of moving forward (yours
> > and another) has unexpectedly failed.  The situation looks hopeless
> > too, because you now doubt that such comparisons could ever work in
> > principle.  In other words, you now doubt the first 4 steps of your
> > own overplan: http://metagovernment.org/wiki/Overplan/c/WtG
>
> Yes. So it seems.
>
> > Should we remove those steps?  That would leave only these ones:
> >
> >    CtD    (CtD) Compare the technical designs
> >     |     (IdG) Identify the common ground
> >    IdG    (WtG) Work together on the common ground
> >     |     (LeG) Leverage the common ground
> >    WtG
> >     |
> >    LeG
>
> Yes, maybe that would be better for now.
>
> > Or what would be better?  We want to accurately document the steps
> > forward that you and Meinungsfindungstool sincerely recommend, which
> > means the steps you're actually willing and intending to take.
>
> We at AG MFT would like to proceed with step "CtD" anyway.
>
> Cheers
> Marc

_______________________________________________
Start : a mailing list of the Metagovernment project
http://www.metagovernment.org/
Post to the list: Start AT metagovernment.org
Manage subscription: http://metagovernment.org/mailman/listinfo/start_metagovernment.org