Zum Inhalt springen.
Sympa Menü

ag-meinungsfindungstool - Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] The way forward according to technicians

ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de

Betreff: Ag-meinungsfindungstool mailing list

Listenarchiv

Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] The way forward according to technicians


Chronologisch Thread 
  • From: Henri Nathanson <henri.nathanson AT gmail.com>
  • To: marc <marc AT merkstduwas.de>, AG MFT <ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de>
  • Subject: Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] The way forward according to technicians
  • Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 23:36:08 +0200
  • List-archive: <https://service.piratenpartei.de/pipermail/ag-meinungsfindungstool>
  • List-id: <ag-meinungsfindungstool.lists.piratenpartei.de>

Oh lol.
You are so pathetic. Do you expect to find democracy by building a common ground for that list of bullshit? Really?? Haha. This is so very funny. Sorry guys, but you cannot exchange reasoning with anything you are doing here. Not as you claim to go for participatory or whatever you silly name democracy. The latter sits right on my very lap so beautifully. And you wont get anything from her besides what you get from me. I put her up for you here in pirate world. But you brilliantly brightly did not even get a glimpse as you are so busy digging in mud. I am really wondering how long you will go on with your kids mud games? It took me ten years to understand democracy. You will likely not get it in a much longer period of time. And for the case you envy me. I dont really care. If you dont share. My knowledge of democracy. As I stay king as long as you dont dare.
Gute Nacht

Am 05.07.2014 13:35 schrieb "marc" <marc AT merkstduwas.de>:
Hi Mike,

That is a very good idea!

In the following I would like to refer to current approaches regarding your list (http://metagovernment.org/wiki/Overplan/soc/des-22) as "designs".

We at AG MFT currently prepare a questionnaire to follow up with a survey where any of this designs could give their feedback in a quite structured form.

For this purpose we are customizing an existing tool called "PM Delta" to contain our specific set of questions. This tool is able to analyse the survey and provide some sophisticated reports.

To be honest, til now we just thought about rough categorizations of the designs, but maybe we could enhance this with a structure that makes it easier to compare the different overplans? But for the beginning we think it might be easier to give specific categories to choose from.

Maybe we could proceed as following:

(1) AG MFT is close to finish a first draft of the questionary for the survey.

(2) As soon as we have completed our proposal, we are going to put it for discussion on the metagov list. Here we could shape the categories and questions together.

(3) After gaining a specific degree of agreement, we try to get as many designs as possible to participate.

(4) Then we analyse this with PM Delta. The outcome of the analysis should be a better understanding of how the different designs are related to each other. How big or small the common ground is, to build upon. What are the aspects that separate and connect us.

(5) Then we focus on the things that connect us rather than separate us!

What do you think?

Cheers
Marc


-----Original Message----- From: Michael Allan
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 2:54 AM
To: Metagov
Subject: [MG] The way forward according to technicians

Here's a list of 77 technical designs for participatory democracy.
These are all of the novel (or radical) practices, techniques, tools,
systems and other facilities that we know of (please add any that are
missing): http://metagovernment.org/wiki/Overplan/soc/des-22

I was thinking we could ask each of the designers, "By what steps
could your design advance the field of participatory democracy, or
otherwise achieve an outcome that is beneficial to humanity?"  We
could record the answers (the steps they foresee) and then get a feel
for the different possibilities of moving forward.

That's just one idea.  I don't mean we should necessarily jump in and
do that right now.  I'm more interested in what others think.

--
Michael Allan (a technician)

Toronto, +1 416-699-9528
http://zelea.com/

_______________________________________________
Start : a mailing list of the Metagovernment project
http://www.metagovernment.org/
Post to the list: Start AT metagovernment.org
Manage subscription: http://metagovernment.org/mailman/listinfo/start_metagovernment.org

--
Ag-meinungsfindungstool mailing list
Ag-meinungsfindungstool@lists.piratenpartei.de
https://service.piratenpartei.de/listinfo/ag-meinungsfindungstool



Archiv bereitgestellt durch MHonArc 2.6.19.

Seitenanfang