Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] The way forward according to technicians (Marc of Meinungsfindungstool)

["marc" <marc AT merkstduwas.de>]

Mike said:
> So your attempt to compare two different ways of moving forward (yours
> and another) has unexpectedly failed.  The situation looks hopeless
> too, because you now doubt that such comparisons could ever work in
> principle.  In other words, you now doubt the first 4 steps of your
> own overplan: http://metagovernment.org/wiki/Overplan/c/WtG

Yes. So it seems.

> Should we remove those steps?  That would leave only these ones:
>
>    CtD    (CtD) Compare the technical designs
>     |     (IdG) Identify the common ground
>    IdG    (WtG) Work together on the common ground
>     |     (LeG) Leverage the common ground
>    WtG
>     |
>    LeG

Yes, maybe that would be better for now.

> Or what would be better?  We want to accurately document the steps
> forward that you and Meinungsfindungstool sincerely recommend, which
> means the steps you're actually willing and intending to take.

We at AG MFT would like to proceed with step "CtD" anyway.

Cheers
Marc