Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation

[Slash <pirate_slash AT yahoo.com>]

Yes. :)

Greetings,
/ aka Oliver

Michael Allan schrieb:

> Marc said:
> > I totally agree with Slash!
> Please, I don't understand your answer. Do you think that opinion
> expression (as I have described it) will be an essential part (among
> other essential parts) of the platform you are designing?
>
> Michael
>
> Slash said:
> > I've got 2 things to say to your concerns, Michael:
> > 1. Your concerns feel like a dejavu to me; when ThomasE joined our
> > monday-meetings in mumble for the first time, we had the same
> > discussion. He had the same concerns than you and end of the story
> > is, that he is still with us, which is pretty revealing ^^ ...
> > 2. It's a question of what plug-ins are integrated into the framework:
> > If amoung the plug-ins is at least one plug-in, that enables "divorced
> > consensus practices", then yes, the discussion platform does so.
> > You know, particularly regarding discussion splitting we had a long
> > discussion in the past; not everyone was happy with that step.
> > And why ? Because they had something different in their mind and
> > felt the threat, that their idea gets out-sorted by focussing on or
> > integration of discussion splitting.
> > We solved this conflict - which in case we all would try to bring us
> > to work on just one single MFT certainly would not stay the only
> > conflict - by this seperation of basic structure and detail structure,
> > or let's say framework + plug-ins.
> > So, there is room for pretty much all thinkable discussion methods,
> > no matter if it incorporates splitting, full text, text devision based
> > discussing, argument mapping, grouping, single input, and so on...
> > I guess there would be less questions and misunderstandings, if
> > the english translation of our basic idea would be ready; plz be patient,
> > it's in the process of being made:
> > https://meinungsfindungstool.piratenpad.de/Anforderungsanalyse-Grundidee-translation
> > Well actually I see that indeed it is ready, but not neatly condenced
> > to a full-and-only english text; just read from line 84.
> > The colored lines are the translation of the uncolored german lines 
> > after that.
> > Greeting,
> > / aka Oliver
>
> Marc said:
> > I totally agree with Slash!