Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Helping the Pirate Party to vanish

[Michael Allan <mike AT zelea.com>]

Thanks Marc,

Looking at your D!sco architecture:
http://wiki.piratenpartei.de/wiki/images/3/37/DiscussionSystem-Overview.jpg

On our side, Conseo recently inserted a P2P data-sync layer into our
understanding of the primary voting inter-network:
http://mail.zelea.com/list/votorola/2013-April/001691.html
I never think much about transport layers, but probably Conseo is
right.  The standard practice won't be ad hoc connections between
individual peers, as I always pictured it.  Instead there'll be a
general purpose data-sync layer at the bottom.

You guys seem to be ahead of us here.  Hopefully this is a piece of
infrastructure we can share in common.

Till Friday,
Mike


marc said:
> Hi Mike,
> 
> I won't be able to read the background information in detail until Friday. 
> But nevertheless let's have a talk on Friday and see if there are any 
> differences in general. Even if I don't think so you never know ;o)
> 
> There is no new background reading in terms of AG MFT. If you are familiar 
> with the "Grundidee" (Basic Idea or Vision) of AG MFT 
> (http://wiki.piratenpartei.de/AG_Meinungsfindungstool/Ergebnisse/DieGrundidee)
>  
> and have had a look on the Big Picture 
> (http://wiki.piratenpartei.de/wiki/images/7/72/MFT_BigPicture_v01.jpg) and 
> the Discussion System Overview 
> (http://wiki.piratenpartei.de/wiki/images/3/37/DiscussionSystem-Overview.jpg)
>  
> you are well prepared ;o)
> 
> Cheers
> Marc