Zum Inhalt springen.
Sympa Menü

ag-drogen - Re: [Drogenpolitik] Portugal

ag-drogen AT lists.piratenpartei.de

Betreff: Mailingliste der AG Drogen- und Suchtpolitik

Listenarchiv

Re: [Drogenpolitik] Portugal


Chronologisch Thread 
  • From: TomKarla <TomKarla AT gmx.de>
  • To: Mailingliste der AG Drogenpolitik <ag-drogen AT lists.piratenpartei.de>
  • Subject: Re: [Drogenpolitik] Portugal
  • Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:39:15 +0200
  • List-archive: <https://service.piratenpartei.de/pipermail/ag-drogen>
  • List-id: Mailingliste der AG Drogenpolitik <ag-drogen.lists.piratenpartei.de>

Guido, noch viel besser is ditte:

http://www.cato.org/pubs/wtpapers/greenwald_whitepaper.pdf

Von Glenn Greenwald, 2006, Verfassungsrechtler

mehr brauchen wir nich :-)

TomKarla

Am 16.04.2012 um 19:16 schrieb TomKarla:

> Hallo Guido,
>
> ich hab noch eine sehr gute Quelle gefunden. 2011 gab es eine Auswertung zu
> Effekten der Entkriminalisierung von Alex Stevens (Prof. für Kriminalistik,
> University Kent). Es gibt eine Kurzfassung seiner Aussagen im Guardian:
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/05/portugal-uk-drugs-decriminalisation
>
> Hier eine Kopie:
> Series: The Observer drugs debate
>
> Previous | Next | Index
> Britain's drug policy will not improve until we are bold enough to
> experiment
>
> We can't know the potential benefits of innovations like Portugal's unless
> we research them, says Alex Stevens
>
>
> Share 75
> reddit this
> Comments (8)
>
> By Alex Stevens
> The Observer, Sunday 5 September 2010
> Article history
> For years, the UK government has consistently used a myth to stave off any
> bold innovations in our failing drug policy. It has predicted that
> liberalisation would inevitably lead to higher rates of drug use and
> related harms. The example of Portugal seriously challenges this argument.
>
> The idea that decriminalisation increases drug problems was already on
> shaky ground. Several countries and US states have reduced or eliminated
> criminal penalties for drug possession. They do not generally have higher
> rates of drug use than their neighbours. The rate of cannabis use in the
> Netherlands, for example, is lower than in the UK, even though the Dutch
> decriminalised the use of cannabis in 1976. The Portuguese experience again
> shows that there is no necessary link between the severity of sanctions and
> rates of drug use. There have been some increases reported in drug use by
> Portuguese adults since 2001, but these are no greater than those seen in
> other southern European countries. More important are rates of drug use
> among children, as they are more vulnerable to the harmful effects of
> illicit drugs. In Portugal, these rates have fallen since decriminalisation.
>
> As fewer people were arrested for drug offences, the prison population
> fell. So did drug use and HIV among prisoners.
>
> Portugal has also expanded its treatment programmes, including the use of
> prescribed methadone. This would have reduced deaths and infections even
> without decriminalisation, as it has elsewhere.
>
> There are limits to the ability of decriminalisation to deal with harm
> related to illicit drug markets. The policy has not cleared the dealers off
> the cobbled streets of Lisbon's Bairro Alto. It cannot eliminate the
> violence related to the unregulated economy of drug supply. Since
> decriminalisation, Portugal's murder rate has increased, but it is not
> known how much of this is linked to the drugs trade. The answer could be to
> take the business out of the hands of violent criminals by handing it to
> tightly regulated legal organisations, as has been suggested by the
> Transform Drug Policy Foundation and others.
>
> The potential benefits and costs of drug policy innovations will remain
> incalculable as long as governments refuse to implement and research them.
> The Portuguese began their apparently beneficial policy only after
> commissioning research from respected academics. In the UK last autumn, we
> saw the removal of the government's leading scientific adviser, Professor
> David Nutt, for daring to tell the truth about its policies on cannabis and
> ecstasy. Labour and the Conservatives colluded in this denial of the
> evidence. They are now conspiring to block the creation of more effective,
> evidence-based policies on alcohol. They have argued against the
> introduction of a minimum unit price in Scotland on the basis that it is
> experimental. But without experimentation, how can we create more effective
> policies?
>
> Politicians usually only suggest decriminalisation when they are either on
> the verge of retirement or at the fringes of power. As a young MP, David
> Cameron himself acknowledged the failures of current policies. He supported
> fresh thinking on liberalisation, heroin prescription and drug consumption
> rooms. The Portuguese example suggests he should have the courage of his
> earlier convictions, now that he is in a position to enact them.
>
>
> Alex Stevens is professor of criminal justice at the University of Kent and
> the author of Drugs, Crime and Public Health (Routledge, 2011)
> --
> AG-Drogen mailing list
> AG-Drogen AT lists.piratenpartei.de
> https://service.piratenpartei.de/listinfo/ag-drogen





Archiv bereitgestellt durch MHonArc 2.6.19.

Seitenanfang