ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de
Betreff: Ag-meinungsfindungstool mailing list
Listenarchiv
Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework
Chronologisch Thread
- From: Thomas von der Elbe <ThomasvonderElbe AT gmx.de>
- To: Start/Metagov <start AT metagovernment.org>, AG Meinungsfindungstool <ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de>
- Subject: Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework
- Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:33:36 +0100
- List-archive: <https://service.piratenpartei.de/pipermail/ag-meinungsfindungstool>
- List-id: <ag-meinungsfindungstool.lists.piratenpartei.de>
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 13:38, Michael Allan wrote:
Or, if nobody has a strong preference, then we might begin now. Step
(a) is easily reversible if objections happen to arise later
Ok, I didn't know, that it is so easy to reverse.
Then +1 from me.
What do others think?
Thomas
, and step
(c) allows anyone who objects to turn the switch to the off position.
The steps again are: *
(a) We deploy the main user interface of Votorola in Metagov web
pages, including the wiki pages and the mailing list archive.
(b) We make it known that we want other projects to do the same. If
they do not have software with this capability, they can either
copy ours (we'll help them), or build their own.
(c) Together with the second project that joins, we develop a
neutral tool switch. ...
(d) All the while, we work (each in our own projects) to ensure our
toolsets integrate nicely with Metagov practices.
With (a) done (and easy to undo), we can begin to think about (b).
How do we advertise our openness? What kind of sign do we hang? (At
this point, too, the issues become less abstract. So it's easier for
people to voice their opposition and support.)
So we can hold our horses till after next Thursday, or move now.
Whichever we prefer.
Mike
*
http://metagovernment.org/pipermail/start_metagovernment.org/2012-November/005130.html
Thomas von der Elbe said:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 2:50, Ed Pastore wrote:
It looks like we are starting to come to an understanding, which is
wonderful.
Yes, looks like it! :-)
Now, how should we proceed? I propose, we wait another 7 days for
possible objections and in case there are none, we go ahead with the
described steps.
What do you think?
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Start : a mailing list of the Metagovernment project
http://www.metagovernment.org/
Post to the list: Start AT metagovernment.org
Manage subscription:
http://metagovernment.org/mailman/listinfo/start_metagovernment.org
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, (fortgesetzt)
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Michael Allan, 13.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, marc, 13.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Michael Allan, 14.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Thomas von der Elbe, 14.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, marc, 14.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Thomas von der Elbe, 14.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, marc, 14.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Thomas von der Elbe, 14.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Michael Allan, 14.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Ronald Grindle, 14.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Ed Pastore, 15.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Thomas von der Elbe, 15.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Michael Allan, 17.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Thomas von der Elbe, 18.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Ed Pastore, 18.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Michael Allan, 18.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Alexander Praetorius, 18.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Michael Allan, 19.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Michael Allan, 29.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Thomas von der Elbe, 18.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Ed Pastore, 19.11.2012
- [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Mumble heute Abend, Frauke Mattfeldt, 19.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Michael Allan, 17.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Thomas von der Elbe, 15.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Ed Pastore, 15.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, marc, 13.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Michael Allan, 13.11.2012
Archiv bereitgestellt durch MHonArc 2.6.19.