ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de
Betreff: Ag-meinungsfindungstool mailing list
Listenarchiv
Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework
Chronologisch Thread
- From: Alexander Praetorius <citizen AT serapath.de>
- To: Piraten AG Meinungsfindungstool <ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de>, "Start/Metagov" <start AT metagovernment.org>
- Subject: Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework
- Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:57:51 +0100
- List-archive: <https://service.piratenpartei.de/pipermail/ag-meinungsfindungstool>
- List-id: <ag-meinungsfindungstool.lists.piratenpartei.de>
Hey, looks great - I still dont have any clue of how this toolbar works, but it feels like progress and thats a good thing.
I mean, i dont understand the workflow, but its fun clicking around :-)
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Michael Allan <mike AT zelea.com> wrote:
Thomas and Ed,
Hey guys, I went ahead and did step (a) in the wiki. Just so it's
easier to see what we're talking about.
> what is involved in step a. ...
Ed said:
> I don't think I have any objections, though I'm still unclear on
Here's how it looks in the wiki:
http://metagovernment.org/wiki/Main_Page
(may need to hit refresh)
You shouldn't see anything on IE. On Firefox and Chrome (possibly
others) you should see a black toolbar at top. You'll see it on every
page. (Don't worry about how to use it yet, that's not the point. ;^)
> ... Does it take the form of additions to the existing Metagov wiki?
To do this, I made the following changes:
http://metagovernment.org/w/index.php5?title=MediaWiki:Common.css&curid=331&diff=3541&oldid=3364
http://metagovernment.org/w/index.php5?title=MediaWiki:Common.js&curid=449&diff=3544&oldid=3458
The switch design was supposed to come in step (c). Meantime it's a
> And if so, where would the "switch" appear? In the User Preferences?
null switch with a single position, Votorola. That'll be a problem
for some folks (rightfully), so we might be forced to hack together a
switch earlier. And maybe it could help us with step (b).
Suppose the switch had two positions instead of one: (0) banner ad,
(b) We make it known that we want other projects to do the same. If
they do not have software with this capability, they can either
copy ours (we'll help them), or build their own.
and (1) Votorola. Not sure exactly what would go on the banner ad,
but somehow it would do the job of (b). And (0) would be the default
position, ofc.
If the switch UI (dial or whatever) were close to the switched views
(banner ad, toolsets), then the user could change toolsets on the fly.
Maybe the ad could even invite the user to operate the switch and see
what's on offer. Should we look into a quick design for this?
To do the same with the list archive, we might use something like
> Also, what do you need from me to deploy?
Apache Substitute. We'd need info about the host web server:
* Is it Apache?
* Does it support mod_substitute, mod_sed, or mod_line_edit?
* Where in the file system is Mailman's public archive directory
(mailman/archives/public/) that Apache serves?
http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-install/node10.html
* How do we configure the service of that directory? Via central
config files, as here for example?
http://havoc.zelea.com/system/host/havoc/etc/apache2/modules.d/50_mailman.conf
Or via a .htaccess file in the directory itself?
Meantime, I can look into what's involved in migrating to TuxFamily.
Is this the latest information on that?
http://www.metagovernment.org/wiki/Upgrade_backlog#TuxFamily_Migration
Mike
Ed Pastore said:
> I don't think I have any objections, though I'm still unclear on
> what is involved in step a. Does it take the form of additions to
> the existing Metagov wiki? And if so, where would the "switch"
> appear? In the User Preferences?
> Also, what do you need from me to deploy?
>
>
> On Nov 18, 2012, at 4:33 AM, Thomas von der Elbe wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 13:38, Michael Allan wrote:
> >>
> >> Or, if nobody has a strong preference, then we might begin now. Step
> >> (a) is easily reversible if objections happen to arise later
> >
> > Ok, I didn't know, that it is so easy to reverse.
> >
> > Then +1 from me.
> > What do others think?
--
Ag-meinungsfindungstool mailing list
Ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de
https://service.piratenpartei.de/listinfo/ag-meinungsfindungstool
Best Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
***********************************************
Alexander Praetorius
Rappstraße 13
D - 60318 Frankfurt am Main
Germany
[skype] alexander.praetorius
[mail] citizen AT serapath.de
***********************************************
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, (fortgesetzt)
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Thomas von der Elbe, 14.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, marc, 14.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Thomas von der Elbe, 14.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, marc, 14.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Ronald Grindle, 14.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Ed Pastore, 15.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Thomas von der Elbe, 15.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Michael Allan, 17.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Thomas von der Elbe, 18.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Ed Pastore, 18.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Michael Allan, 18.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Alexander Praetorius, 18.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Michael Allan, 19.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Michael Allan, 29.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Thomas von der Elbe, 18.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Ed Pastore, 19.11.2012
- [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Mumble heute Abend, Frauke Mattfeldt, 19.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Michael Allan, 17.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Thomas von der Elbe, 15.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Ed Pastore, 15.11.2012
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Thomas von der Elbe, 14.11.2012
Archiv bereitgestellt durch MHonArc 2.6.19.