Zum Inhalt springen.
Sympa Menü

ag-meinungsfindungstool - Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation: Outcome A

ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de

Betreff: Ag-meinungsfindungstool mailing list

Listenarchiv

Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation: Outcome A


Chronologisch Thread 
  • From: Michael Allan <mike AT zelea.com>
  • To: Start/Metagov <start AT metagovernment.org>, AG Meinungsfindungstool <ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de>
  • Subject: Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Requirements in regard to split opinion formation: Outcome A
  • Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:46:42 -0400
  • List-archive: <https://service.piratenpartei.de/pipermail/ag-meinungsfindungstool>
  • List-id: <ag-meinungsfindungstool.lists.piratenpartei.de>

Hi Mark,

> Or did I get something wrong?

Nothing I can see. In fact, I think you folks are doing a lot that's
right, which is why I ask for your help... over here on the B side:
http://metagovernment.org/pipermail/start_metagovernment.org/2012-October/005114.html

Mike


marc said:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Please don't think of competition as a fight with only negative impact -
> think of it more in a cooperate way. The tools can also influence each
> other
> in a positive way, instead of just dominating.
>
> At the end there might be an evolution of all possible and thinkable
> methodologies of discussion towards the optimum of decision-making tools.
>
> And yes, of course, some tools might die. But again this must not be seen
> as
> a bad thing.
>
> With the Common Discussion Framework Standard you can easily move your
> discussion over to another tool - and no effort on those tools is lost!
>
> Or did I get something wrong?
>
> Cheers
> Marc




Archiv bereitgestellt durch MHonArc 2.6.19.

Seitenanfang