ag-geldordnung-und-finanzpolitik AT lists.piratenpartei.de
Betreff: Kommunikationsmedium der bundesweiten AG Geldordnung und Finanzpolitik
Listenarchiv
- From: moneymind <moneymind AT gmx.de>
- To: ag-geldordnung-und-finanzpolitik AT lists.piratenpartei.de
- Subject: [AG-GOuFP] Hammer: Mehrling - Why money is difficult
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:09:12 +0000
- List-archive: <https://service.piratenpartei.de/pipermail/ag-geldordnung-und-finanzpolitik>
- List-id: Kommunikationsmedium der bundesweiten AG Geldordnung und Finanzpolitik <ag-geldordnung-und-finanzpolitik.lists.piratenpartei.de>
Diesen Hammer-Text wollte ich euch nicht vorenthalten.
http://www.perrymehrling.com/2015/06/why-is-money-difficult/
VOLL auf den Punkt.
"The fourth barrier is what Hawtrey called “the inherent instability of credit”. Promises to pay are made and accepted today, but the future to which they refer inevitably turns out different than anyone imagined at inception, so some failure is to be expected. More important, all credit (non-bank as well as bank credit) seems to be subject to a kind of positive feedback loop since, as more and more people come to have a common view of the possible future, promises to pay in that possible future get bid up in value and that makes it easy, indeed inevitable, to overpromise.
This fact of inherent instability is something we have an especially hard time confronting, since it goes to the heart of our existential dilemma. We don’t know the future but we are nevertheless required to behave as though we do. Indeed, the commitments we make to one another to perform in various ways in the future form the very fabric of the society in which we live. Marriage is like that, and so is credit. The fact of financial instability threatens that fabric, indeed constitutes a kind of unraveling of that fabric, as default on one set of promises undermines another set as well. As economists, we cling to conceptions of equilibrium, including intertemporal equilibrium, which have the reassuring property of excluding instability, but the resulting psychological comfort is bought at the price of abstraction from a fundamental feature of the actual system in which we live."
Ich würde sagen: es gibt verschiedene Wege, diese "Unsicherheit der Zukunft" subjektiv wegzubekommen:
- Glaube (machen die meisten)
- Macht (da zähle ich auch die Vollgeldler rein)
Seltener:
- Vertrauen + Mut.
Der Mehrling ist echt ein Ausnahmetyp.
- [AG-GOuFP] Hammer: Mehrling - Why money is difficult, moneymind, 24.09.2015
Archiv bereitgestellt durch MHonArc 2.6.19.