int-koordination AT lists.piratenpartei.de
Betreff: Internationale Koordination
Listenarchiv
[Int-koordination] Fwd: [PP-EU.programme] Update for the Czech proposal for common program
Chronologisch Thread
- From: Martina Pöser <martina.poeser AT bremen.piratenpartei.de>
- To: Internationale Koordination <int-koordination AT lists.piratenpartei.de>
- Subject: [Int-koordination] Fwd: [PP-EU.programme] Update for the Czech proposal for common program
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:25:22 +0100
- List-archive: <https://service.piratenpartei.de/pipermail/int-koordination>
- List-id: Internationale Koordination <int-koordination.lists.piratenpartei.de>
Moin, hier der neue tschechische Vorschlag. Ich denke die Idee einer Zweiteilung ist gar nicht schlecht, haben wir ja auch schon für den BPT so eingereicht. Andererseits würde ich die Themen des Gemeinsamen Programms nicht vorher festlegen, sondern diese werden sich aus dem kleinsten gemeinsamen Nenner der vorliegenden Programmvorschläge und Änderungswünsche von selbst ergeben. Wie man aus dem schwedischen Vorschlag schon ersehen kann, ist Direct Democracy kein gemeinsames Thema. :-( LG, Martina -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Betreff: [PP-EU.programme] Update for the Czech proposal for common program Datum: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:17:00 +0100 (CET) Von: <marketa.gregorova AT pirati.cz> Antwort an: PP-EU Programme development <pp-eu.programme AT lists.pp-international.net> An: <pp-eu AT lists.pp-international.net>, <pp-eu.programme AT lists.pp-international.net>, <international AT pirateparty.gr>, <pp-eu.coordinators AT lists.pp-international.net>, "BJARNEMALM Mattias" <mattias.bjarnemalm AT europarl.europa.eu> Hello fellow Pirates,
We, the Czech Pirate Party, thoroughly discussed the concept of
common program in context of the German and our own proposal and
we came to decision, that we should change our approach.
We'd like to introduce a new, or let's say modified proposal. The main idea is that - as already the Swedish Pirate Party wrote - different parties affect various topics in their domestic programs so we have to find an intersection. Plus, of course, to reach a consensus in so many topics in such a short time is exaggerated, though we really admire the German proposal and all the effort and thoughts they put in it.
That's why our way is in the end quite minimalistic, but in our opinion practical: We propose to agree on approximately three main Pirate topics, that'll be the core of the common program; with an option for each country to freely extend it on issues specific for them.
So as to be more specific, our proposed outline of the common
program is:
Preamble
- generally what are Pirate Parties
1.
Freedom of information
a) reform of copyright
b) patents reform
c) freedom of Internet
2.
Protection of privacy
3.
Direct democracy,
where
1, 2 and 3 are the main Pirate topics we suppose everyone can
agree and work on and a), b) and c) might serve as an
illustration of what might be the extension (though we'd like
to work on these three together).
I'm
not going to be present in Athens (only remotely), but our
delegate Mikuláš Peksa is going to be there and act on
behalf of the PP-CZ, so you can consult anything either with
him personally, or through mumble (etc.) with me.
I
would also like to add that due to the nature of our proposal I
suggest to vote on this "model" of common program at the
beginning of the conference.
Thank
you very much in advance and regarrrds,
-- Markéta Gregorová Head of the International Dept., PP-CZ |
PP-EU.Programme mailing list
PP-EU.Programme AT lists.pp-international.net
http://lists.pp-international.net/listinfo/pp-eu.programme
- [Int-koordination] Fwd: [PP-EU.programme] Update for the Czech proposal for common program, Martina Pöser, 31.10.2013
Archiv bereitgestellt durch MHonArc 2.6.19.