Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [MG] Defensible in discourse?

["marc" <marc AT merkstduwas.de>]

Hi Max,

Please find the current description of the *qualifizierter Konsens* 
(qKonsens) here:
http://wiki.piratenpartei.de/Datei:Definition-qKonsens-2013-12-DRAFT.pdf

Please be aware that the qKonsens is part of the *d!sco network* that is 
described in multiple parts collected here:
http://metagovernment.org/pipermail/start_metagovernment.org/2013-December/006046.html

Please let us know what you think about it!

Cheers
marc

-----Original Message----- 
From: max stalnaker
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 5:53 PM
To: marc
Cc: npconner AT earthlink.net ; Piraten AG Meinungsfindungstool ; 
Metagovernment Project
Subject: Re: [MG] Defensible in discourse?



Marc,

Hee.  I Am Sure It Would Turn Out To match.  But maybe a Google translate or 
something would give us a clue if you just posted the spec here or provided 
the url link to the Web site.  :-)

Max

On Jan 15, 2014 7:04 AM, "marc" <marc AT merkstduwas.de> wrote:
Hi Ned + Max,

Sorry for stepping in and *just* grabbing one single aspect from the whole 
thread, but I just came across this by chance:

In response to Max, Ned Conner wrote:
On a perhaps related note, awhile back you had this to say:

7. The two stones I wish to place in the mosaic matrix is a discussion
format and a document creation process that makes everyone more
thoughtful. Doing this with respect to public policy discussions is no
more urgent than with respect to many other areas. But I believe if
we cannot get more thoughtfulness we all will continue as we have
been in terms of results.

Are either of those stones ready to place yet? (If not as operational
systems, at least in the form of functional specifications and design
notes and such ...)

IMHO the AG MFT is exactly working on this at the moment. At least this is 
true for the specification of your second stone. Maybe also including the 
first one, depending on what the meaning of *discussion format* is.

We also already started to prototype an implementation of this 
specification - the so called *Qualified Consensus* (*qualifizierter 
Konsens* in german or just *qKonsens* for short or *qK* even shorter ;o) 
methodology.

Unfortunately at the moment we don't have any free resources to translate 
the specification to english. Maybe you could describe your intention about 
the *discussion format* and *document creation process* in more detail, so 
we can see if that matches with the qK!?

Cheers
marc

_______________________________________________
Start : a mailing list of the Metagovernment project
http://www.metagovernment.org/
Post to the list: Start AT metagovernment.org
Manage subscription: 
http://metagovernment.org/mailman/listinfo/start_metagovernment.org