ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de
Betreff: Ag-meinungsfindungstool mailing list
Listenarchiv
- From: Michael Allan <mike AT zelea.com>
- To: AG Meinungsfindungstool <ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de>
- Subject: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Public mirrors
- Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 00:17:39 -0400
- List-archive: <https://service.piratenpartei.de/pipermail/ag-meinungsfindungstool>
- List-id: <ag-meinungsfindungstool.lists.piratenpartei.de>
Dear folks, (apologies for the English cross-post)
I'm seeking potential collaborators to help move a small project
forward. This would be for technically inclined thinkers or do-ers
with a little spare time to volunteer. Please forward to anyone you
think might be interested. My contact details are at bottom.
The following description is abstracted from a larger design sketch:
http://zelea.com/mediawiki/index.php?oldid=5998
A public mirror is a device that enables an open, topical community
(a public) to formalize the definitive bounds of its own communica-
tions, and therein the image of itself. It works by revealing the
topical discussion as a whole. The revealing image is formed at
the mirror front as a timely sequence of references (links) each
pointing to a communication of the public, such that all links
together define the total of that public's communications in time
and space.
reveals the
whole discussion
/\ on a single topic
/ \ /
/ \ /
Ago Place Thread /
------- --------- ----------------/---------------------
17 min r/Foo Who are these Foos, anyway?
5 hr Foo-L The problem with so and so's proposal.
1 day FuBarz What's the best thingamy for such and such?
1 day r/Foo This, that, and the next thing.
2 days FooForum How do we attach the doohickey?
------- -----\--- --------------------------------------
V \ (click to visit)
\ \
cuts across \
all media affords entry
to the discussion
[MF] Concept sketch of a mirror front.
http://zelea.com/project/mir/mirrorFront-concept-620.png
The mirror front is similar in form to a conventional news feed.
It aggregates a timely sequence of disclosures concerning a
specific topic or topical category. The differences are in a) the
exclusion of mass communications from the sequence, b) the claim to
totality, and c) the self-determination that redeems that claim.
(a) A principle criterion for the inclusion of a boundary link in
the sequence is that one may immediately join the linked communica-
tion and reply in kind as a peer. The link is always actually to
an *inter*-communication, a thread of discussion, and always among
peers; unidirectional or asymmetric exchanges such as mass
communications are excluded.
(b) The image formed at the mirror front is asserted to cover the
entire public discussion of the topic across all communication
media and sites. It claims to be the most complete, accurate and
up-to-date outline of the extended discourse that is available
anywhere.
(c) This claim is redeemed by the public members themselves who
continually submit the boundary links, self-organize the necessary
labour, and self-constitute the necessary government. No aspect of
this redeeming self-determination is controlled by an external
authority.
--
Michael Allan
Toronto, +1 416-699-9528
mike+dated+1378525978.323905 AT havoc.zelea.com
http://zelea.com/
- [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Public mirrors, Michael Allan, 18.08.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Public mirrors, marc, 18.08.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Public mirrors, Michael Allan, 19.08.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Public mirrors, marc, 18.08.2013
Archiv bereitgestellt durch MHonArc 2.6.19.