ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de
Betreff: Ag-meinungsfindungstool mailing list
Listenarchiv
Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating withAG Meinungsfindungstool
Chronologisch Thread
- From: Alexander Praetorius <citizen AT serapath.de>
- To: marc <marc AT merkstduwas.de>
- Cc: Votorola <votorola AT zelea.com>, Piraten AG Meinungsfindungstool <ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de>, Metagovernment Project <start AT metagovernment.org>, AG Liquid Democracy <ag-liquid-democracy AT lists.piratenpartei.de>
- Subject: Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating withAG Meinungsfindungstool
- Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:43:45 +0100
- List-archive: <https://service.piratenpartei.de/pipermail/ag-meinungsfindungstool>
- List-id: <ag-meinungsfindungstool.lists.piratenpartei.de>
Maybe this is the way to bring forward "vote mirroring"
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:08 AM, marc <marc AT merkstduwas.de> wrote:
Hi Micheal,
Currently the working group AG MFT tries to establish several kind of prototypes of a) one concrete methodology (qkonsens), b) concrete portal/web site (probble.de) and c) concrete Common Discussion Standard based on an ontology and a web api (disco.codeplex.com).
As you put it, all our work is part of #2 (Discussion System) within the overall decision-making process. But nevertheless, I don't think that our working group wants to be competitor to any other project in this area. Our aim is rather to cooperate with as much projects as possible.
Unfortunately the progress of our working group based on our volunteer work is not as fast as I would like to see it. For a better progress our working group devided into the following four teams:
a) Ontology Definition Team (ODT) - deals with the ontology specification.
b) Prototype Core Team (PCT) - deals with the imlementation of a database schema based on the ontology and a web api to access the data in a restful way.
c) Prototype Plug-In Team )PPT) - deals with the implementation of concrete discussion methodologies.
d) Public Releations Team (PRT) - deals with our 'public relations' ;o)
My individual next tasks are in terms of the PCT a) to create a conceptual description of our d!sco prototype on CodePlex and b) creating a first implementation of the Web API.
As soon as this is established, I would like to invite you to brainstorm about possible collaboration. From our point of view this is a question of how to make the data available for all other interested parties. Because our goal is to define a common discussion ontologie, inspired by and particularly based on eDialogus (http://www.imc.com.gr/ontologies/eDialogos/consensus/).
So the overall question to be answered from your side is: Do you want to participate in such kind of standardized ontology to enable easy data exchange with any participating tool?
I would like to welcome you. What do you think?
Cheers
marc
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Allan
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 5:19 AM
To: AG Meinungsfindungstool
Cc: Votorola ; Start/Metagov ; AG Liquid Democracy
Subject: Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating withAG Meinungsfindungstool
Thanks for offering, Marc. We both feel the same.
To answer your question, our purpose is to coordinate plans of action
(i.e. to achieve public autonomy) by the method of discussion aimed at
mutual understanding and consensus (i.e. public opinion). In your
diagram, this translates to "position forming" (Standpunktbildung)
based on a discussion system.
http://wiki.piratenpartei.de/wiki/images/7/72/MFT_BigPicture_v01.jpg
Where would you locate Votorola inside this picture?
So we're sitting at #2. That makes us competitors. We (Votorolans,
Outcasters) have been at this for years, where you (AGM) are just
getting started. But I welcome your offer to cooperate, because I
fear that otherwise we might do harm to people. If either of our
platforms were ever to establish itself as a de-facto monopoly that
suppresses other choices through network effects, then users and
citizens would be robbed not only of their freedom, but also of the
opportunity to be the authors of that freedom.
How can we cooperate to prevent that?
Mike
marc said:
Hi Michael,
Yes, of course. We would also like to cooperate with Votorola.
I don't know if you have seen the following big picture (overview of the
decision-making-process) yet:
http://wiki.piratenpartei.de/wiki/images/7/72/MFT_BigPicture_v01.jpg
Where would you locate Votorola inside this picture?
Cheers
marc
-----Original Message----- From: Michael Allan
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 8:27 AM
To: AG Meinungsfindungstool
Cc: Votorola ; Start/Metagov ; AG Liquid Democracy
Subject: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating with
AGMeinungsfindungstool
Hello Marc, (cc Votorola, Metagov, AG Liquid Democracy)
> Top 1 - Abstimmungen
> Fragekatalog für SMVCon
> http://meinungsfindungstool.piratenpad.de/SMVConFragenkatalog
Unfortunately I can't attend SMVcon. But I'd like to share my answer
to one item of the proposed questionnaire (Fragekatalog):
* Are you a developer? If so, can you imagine cooperating with AG
Meinungsfindungstool in the development of a discussion tool?
Yes, I'm a developer for Votorola. Speaking for myself, I'd like to
cooperate. My main requirement would be that the core platform remain
open to all technical designs, including Votorola's. I think the
competence to delimit the user's choice of tools belongs to the user
alone, while we as responsible engineers are competent only to enhance
and extend that personal choice, never to impede it! We've long
understood how to give each user complete freedom of choice in regard
to discussion and opinion-forming tools. We know of at least one
solution (already posted to these lists) that nobody has yet found a
fault with; namely free-range voting based on vote mirroring.
Please let's not surrender our responsibilities and freedoms to a
monopoly controlled by technocrats, or by anyone else. Instead, let's
root out the would-be monopolies and bust them up. Or better yet,
let's prevent them forming in the first place. (Again, we know how,
because it's the same solution.)
--
Michael Allan
Toronto, +1 416-699-9528
http://zelea.com/
--
Ag-meinungsfindungstool mailing list
Ag-meinungsfindungstool@lists.piratenpartei.de
https://service.piratenpartei.de/listinfo/ag-meinungsfindungstool
_______________________________________________
Votorola mailing list
Votorola AT zelea.com
http://mail.zelea.com/mailman/listinfo/votorola
Best Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
***********************************************
Alexander Praetorius
Rappstraße 13
D - 60318 Frankfurt am Main
Germany
[skype] alexander.praetorius
[mail] citizen AT serapath.de
***********************************************
- [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] [EINLADUNG] 2013-03-04 Mumble Arbeitstreffen, marc, 03.03.2013
- [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating with AG Meinungsfindungstool, Michael Allan, 04.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating with AGMeinungsfindungstool, marc, 04.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating with AG Meinungsfindungstool, Michael Allan, 05.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating withAG Meinungsfindungstool, marc, 05.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating withAG Meinungsfindungstool, Alexander Praetorius, 05.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating with AG Meinungsfindungstool, Michael Allan, 05.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating with AG Meinungsfindungstool, Alexander Praetorius, 05.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating with AG Meinungsfindungstool, Frauke Mattfeldt, 05.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating with AG Meinungsfindungstool, Michael Allan, 06.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating with AG Meinungsfindungstool, Alexander Praetorius, 06.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating withAG Meinungsfindungstool, marc, 06.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating withAG Meinungsfindungstool, Alexander Praetorius, 06.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating withAG Meinungsfindungstool, marc, 06.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating with AG Meinungsfindungstool, Michael Allan, 08.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating withAG Meinungsfindungstool, marc, 08.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating withAG Meinungsfindungstool, marc, 05.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating with AG Meinungsfindungstool, Michael Allan, 05.03.2013
- Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating with AGMeinungsfindungstool, marc, 04.03.2013
- [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] (SMVcon) Developers cooperating with AG Meinungsfindungstool, Michael Allan, 04.03.2013
Archiv bereitgestellt durch MHonArc 2.6.19.