Re: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Votorola and AG MFT

["marc" <marc AT merkstduwas.de>]

Hi Mike,

Thank you for your reply.

Just some additional questions for now:

(1) Is there a Votorola instance running somewhere out in the field already?

(2) Who is the audience of Votorola?

(3) How - if at all - does Votorola proof the quality of results 
(consensus)?

(4) Isn't consensus a *kind* of decision result?

And some remarks on what you said:

> I assume you're not interested at first in the broader purpose of
> Votorola (collective freedom and autonomy).  Instead you're looking
> for a clear connection to the concepts of AG MFT.

No, I would like to understand the big picture of Votorola also.


>      The "system" on the right is almost always a decision system.
>      It could be LiquidFeedback (like you expect in AG MFT) or any
>      decision system in society.

Please note that the AG MFT model does *not* expect any particular decision 
system to be in place! From our point of view LQFB is *just* one out of 
many.


> If anything's still unclear, please say so.

I think I got the intention described by the pictures, but still something 
is missing to fill in the gap in my mind. Unfortunately I can't name it. 
Maybe your answers to my questions at the top of this mail will help me to 
understand it better.

Cheers
marc