Zum Inhalt springen.
Sympa Menü

ag-meinungsfindungstool - [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Fwd: [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework

ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de

Betreff: Ag-meinungsfindungstool mailing list

Listenarchiv

[Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Fwd: [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework


Chronologisch Thread 
  • From: Alexander Praetorius <citizen AT serapath.de>
  • To: Piraten AG Meinungsfindungstool <ag-meinungsfindungstool AT lists.piratenpartei.de>
  • Subject: [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Fwd: [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework
  • Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 11:41:38 +0100
  • List-archive: <https://service.piratenpartei.de/pipermail/ag-meinungsfindungstool>
  • List-id: <ag-meinungsfindungstool.lists.piratenpartei.de>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mark Frischmuth <mark AT democracylab.org>
Date: Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework
To: Metagovernment Project <start AT metagovernment.org>
Cc: Jon Poland <jon AT crowdegy.com>


Hi everyone,

Conseo, Thomas and Mike, I'm not sure I'm easily following what you're proposing below.  Let me frame how we're thinking of the same (or very similar) problem out here in the NW corner of the USA..

How can we design a flexible data structure that accommodates the most likely needs of tools to be built on top of it?
What are the minimum common elements of online tools for public engagement, dialogue, decision making, and collaborative action?

1) Identity - what are the characteristics of a user's individual identity?
2) Sociability - how do users communicate with each other?
3) Community - how do communities form? How are they maintained? Who controls a community?
4) Issue Framing - how can flexibility be built into the platform to allow customizable issue framing options?
5) Dialogue and Deliberation - how can discourse be structured to maximize productive outcomes? How can flexible discourse methods be accommodated?
5) Decision Making - how can the platform be designed to accommodate a multiplicity of decision models?
6) Community Organizing - how can community members self-organize to achieve real world results?

I don't have answers.  But I think I'm asking the right questions?

Mark


On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Michael Allan <mike AT zelea.com> wrote:
We propose to use the facilities of Metagov as a plug-in framework for
e-democracy tools and practices.  Conseo, Thomas and I spoke of this
earlier and we agreed to ask the community for permission. [1]

1. Key points
-------------

  a) We deploy the main user interface of Votorola [2] in Metagov web
     pages, including the wiki pages and the mailing list archive.

  b) We make it known that we want other projects to do the same.  If
     they do not have software with this capability, they can either
     copy ours (we'll help them), or build their own.

  c) Together with the second project that joins, we develop a neutral
     tool switch.  It has these functions:

       * Allows each Metagov participant to choose which project's
         toolset to run on Metagov pages.  So different participants
         may run different toolsets.

       * Assigns a random toolset to each new participant.

       * Allows the user to switch toolsets on the fly, or to opt out
         altogether.

  d) All the while, we work (each in our own projects) to ensure our
     toolsets integrate nicely with Metagov practices.


2. Rationale
------------
These are own reasons, but we think they dovetail neatly with
Metagov's aims and methods:

  a) We lower the barrier to cooperation among technical projects.
     The initial cooperation we expect is not vote mirroring, but
     simply the development of a tool switch that enables shared
     exposure of tools on Metagov.  Our experience tells us this can
     be hacked together in a matter of weeks, if not days.

  b) We get exposure on Metagov for Votorola.  Metagov is neutral
     ground and it attracts higher traffic than our own sites.

  c) We get exposure for the idea of cross-project cooperation for
     the sake of healthy competition as opposed to winner-take-all
     brutality.


Does anyone have questions?  What do you think of the idea?

--
Conseo, Thomas and Mike


Notes
-----

  [1] http://mail.zelea.com/list/votorola/2012-November/001487.html

  [2] The main UI of Votorola is the Crossforum Theatre stage:
      http://zelea.com/project/votorola/_/javadoc/votorola/s/gwt/stage/Stage.html
      Running examples are here: (black bar at top)

        http://zelea.com/w/Help:Help
        http://zelea.com/w/User:Test-bg-ZeleaCom/G/p/sandbox

      It's unfinished.  Two more tracks are on the way.  It's tested
      only on Firefox and Chrome, and IE is not yet supported.

_______________________________________________
Start : a mailing list of the Metagovernment project
http://www.metagovernment.org/
Post to the list: Start AT metagovernment.org
Manage subscription: http://metagovernment.org/mailman/listinfo/start_metagovernment.org


_______________________________________________
Start : a mailing list of the Metagovernment project
http://www.metagovernment.org/
Post to the list: Start AT metagovernment.org
Manage subscription: http://metagovernment.org/mailman/listinfo/start_metagovernment.org




--

Best Regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
***********************************************
Alexander Praetorius
Rappstraße 13
D - 60318 Frankfurt am Main
Germany
[skype] alexander.praetorius
[mail] citizen AT serapath.de
[web] http://wiki.piratenpartei.de/Benutzer:Serapath 
***********************************************



  • [Ag Meinungsfindungstool] Fwd: [MG] (proposal) Metagov as a technical plug-in framework, Alexander Praetorius, 08.11.2012

Archiv bereitgestellt durch MHonArc 2.6.19.

Seitenanfang